Amoral Google: “Do no[t stand up to] evil”

I am disgusted with the frequency and indecency of the content in the Google Apps Content Directory.  My father purchased a domain name for the family.  We use the name and accompanying Google Apps website to host our (private) family blog, calendar, wiki, docs, and more.  It’s great.  But there’s one problem:  it’s unsafe for children.  From the Start Page, there is an attractive link on the right: “Add Stuff.”  One click away, and the child, or user, is viewing pornography.

The disclaimer for the iGoogle “add stuff” page reads:

Most of the content in this directory was developed by Google users. Google makes no representations about its performance, quality, or content. Google doesn’t charge for inclusion in this directory or accept payment for better placement.

Source: Add Gadgets to your Homepage,

For a Google Apps site, it reads:

Much of the content in this directory was developed by other companies or by Google’s users, not by Google. Google makes no promises or representations about its performance, quality, or content. Google doesn’t charge for inclusion in this directory or accept payment for better placement.

Source: Google Apps, “Homepage Content Directory”, URL unavailable

While mostly harmless on the surface, this is unacceptable for a family website.  While Google claims to be amoral and “does no evil,” they must not and cannot continue to peddle such filth and make it easily accessible to children.  As a domain administrator, I need the ability to control the items in the Content Directory.  Or, at very least, apply the same “Strict Filtering” algorithm used in normal web searches to the Content Directory.

Basically, I am asking Google to remove pornography from the Start Page of my neices and nephews, all 20 of whom are less than 15 years of age, including pre-teens and young teenagers who are ripe to be lulled down a dark alley on the Internet through an attractive link.  Two weeks ago, Facebook and MySpace were infected with a virus which injected malicious links into the profiles of users.  (If you have an account with them, you might want to check your profile.)

It’s not that I don’t trust the children; I don’t trust myself.  Just today I noticed two comments in my Akshmi spambox.  I happily read and approved both of them, grateful that Akshmi has stopped over 1,000 pieces of comment spam on this website.  One of the comments disagreed me; the other simply stated, “I agreed with you.”  The link posted as the “website” for the visitor included a rape video and dozens of links to similarly evil webpages.  I marked the comment as spam and then validated the links for all the other comments.

What should Google do?  Should they continue to sell advertising space to those who publish, sell, and promote pornography?  Should they continue their somewhat amoral stance?  Obviously, they cannot embrace pornography, because most people recognize it as evil.

What should I do about it?  Should I boycott the search giant’s products and services?  I have used BackRub for years, and I am a loyal advocate, praising them to family and friends.  But if they refuse to filter the pornography in the Content Directory, then we will have to remove our family website from their servers and find a better hosting solution.  It will be hard, and we would have to give up a great deal, but I would far rather sacrifice a few Web2.0 features than see the children of my siblings suffer from clicking a seemingly-innocent link.


5 comments on “Amoral Google: “Do no[t stand up to] evil”

  1. David says:

    Who is raising our kids these days?
    Our prophets have warned us that the internet contains evil things. Anyone who allows a child unrestricted access to the internet is asking for problems. The mentality to ask google to fix the problem stems back to the idea that someone else needs to regulate what I can see on my screen. I am a firm believer in increasing personal responsibility. One can never count the multitude of evils in the world today, and they keep multiplying. I’m not saying that we should allow them to flourish, or require that they be tolerated. Go ahead and petition that Google be more selective in the content they allow, but in the end you will probably pay for that service one way or another. The first and best solution to these kinds of problems is controlling the content yourself. There are plenty of good web-filters out there, and the cost isn’t very much.


  2. […] News » News News Amoral Google: “Do no[t stand up to] evil”2008-08-24 15:19:59Would But if they refuse to remove our family website from their servers and find […]

  3. Luke says:

    Until such time that pornography is removed or made nonaccessible to children, it is so important for parents and teachers and other adults to take responsibility for what kids see online. We need to educate one another about the dangers online, especially in the church. I wrote a post about this recently:

    Accountability software combined with filtering is a great solution for the whole family. Have you heard of accountability software? –

  4. […] have written here in the past my opinion of Google’s claims to be “amoral.”  I invite you to […]

  5. John says:

    I suppose telling your nieces and nephews not to look at pornography would be hats to do. Even if it’s reply only one click away, it tales free will and intent to make that click. It doesn’t seem valid to suggest that Google is peddling anything, when all it does is make available what the user is looking for.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s